What’s Mine is Yours
نویسنده
چکیده
This study is a long-term follow-up on the health and quality of life of Good Samaritan living organ donors who donated an average of 10 years ago. Thirteen donors (kidney, liver, and lung) completed 2 surveys. Data from the RAND 36-Item Health Survey showed that for all domains, as well as the physical and mental component summary scales, the Good Samaritan donor outcomes were superior to the general population (P < .0001). Data from the European Living Donor Satisfaction Survey (EULID) showed that in all 8 theme areas, the donors reported statistically significant positive reactions as compared to negative reactions. With regard to self-reported health status, there was a strong, positive correlation between the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and the EULID (n 1⁄4 13, Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.874). All but 1 donor reported good, very good, or excellent health status. Although donors overwhelmingly reported positivity about the donation experience, narrative comments about adverse events and recipient death must keep transplant teams alert to these critical areas. Good Samaritan organ donors come to the hospital healthy, give a gift to a stranger, and sometimes leave and linger disabled. Donor teams should be observing, questioning, and responding in an effort to maximize their welfare. This research is unique because investigation of the long-term health and psychosocial outcomes of Good Samaritan organ donors is rare. Existing studies that report long-term outcomes of kidney donors do not separately analyze Good Samaritan donor data from related living donors.
منابع مشابه
Concur : An Algorithm for Merging Concurrent Changes without Conflicts
Suppose you and I are both editing a document. You make and change and I make a change, concurrently. Now if we want to still be seeing the same document then I need to apply your change after mine and you mine after yours. But we can’t just apply them willy-nilly. I must amend yours somehow and you mine. If my change is written ∆, yours δ, my amended change δ.∆ and yours ∆.δ, we get ∗∆ ∗ ∆.δ =...
متن کاملMine? Yours? Ours? Reconceptualizing and contextualizing the leader-member relationship
MINE? YOURS? OURS? RECONCEPTUALIZING AND CONTEXTUALIZING THELEADER-MEMBER RELATIONSHIP
متن کاملAbstract Title of Thesis: MINE IS YOURS: MODES OF EXPENSE SHARING IN MARRIED AND COHABITING HOUSEHOLDS
Title of Thesis: MINE IS YOURS: MODES OF EXPENSE SHARING IN MARRIED AND COHABITING HOUSEHOLDS Catharine Hobart Warner, Master of Arts, 2007 Thesis Directed by: Professor John Iceland Department of Sociology Relatively little is known about differences in how married and cohabiting couples share their economic resources. Using the 2001 panel of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIP...
متن کاملThis Is My (Post) Truth, Tell Me Yours; Comment on “The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy”
This is a commentary on the article ‘The rise of post-truth populism in pluralist liberal democracies: challenges for health policy.’ It critically examines two of its key concepts: populism and ‘post truth.’ This commentary argues that there are different types of populism, with unclear links to impacts, and that in some ways, ‘post-truth’ has resonances with arguments advanced in the period a...
متن کاملYours and mine: Toddlers’ talk about possessions with familiar peers
Participants in this study were 66 British toddlers who were observed at home with familiar peers on two occasions, six months apart. The majority of toddlers spoke to their peers, with short sequences of conversation emerging after the age of 24 months. The use of possessive pronouns emerged between 18 and 24 months of age and consolidated over the next year. Toddlers who said ‘mine’ were also...
متن کامل